Saturday, June 23, 2012

How Landauer Is Bringing Bucks Home More Quickly

It takes money to make money. Most investors know that, but with business media so focused on the "how much," very few investors bother to ask, "How fast?"

When judging a company's prospects, how quickly it turns cash outflows into cash inflows can be just as important as how much profit it's booking in the accounting fantasy world we call "earnings." This is one of the first metrics I check when I'm hunting for the market's best stocks. Today, we'll see how it applies to Landauer (NYSE: LDR  ) .

Let's break this down
In this series, we measure how swiftly a company turns cash into goods or services and back into cash. We'll use a quick, relatively foolproof tool known as the cash conversion cycle, or CCC for short.

Why does the CCC matter? The less time it takes a firm to convert outgoing cash into incoming cash, the more powerful and flexible its profit engine is. The less money tied up in inventory and accounts receivable, the more available to grow the company, pay investors, or both.

To calculate the cash conversion cycle, add days inventory outstanding to days sales outstanding, then subtract days payable outstanding. Like golf, the lower your score here, the better. The CCC figure for Landauer for the trailing 12 months is 86.8.

For younger, fast-growth companies, the CCC can give you valuable insight into the sustainability of that growth. A company that's taking longer to make cash may need to tap financing to keep its momentum. For older, mature companies, the CCC can tell you how well the company is managed. Firms that begin to lose control of the CCC may be losing their clout with their suppliers (who might be demanding stricter payment terms) and customers (who might be demanding more generous terms). This can sometimes be an important signal of future distress -- one most investors are likely to miss.

In this series, I'm most interested in comparing a company's CCC to its prior performance. Here's where I believe all investors need to become trend-watchers. Sure, there may be legitimate reasons for an increase in the CCC, but all things being equal, I want to see this number stay steady or move downward over time.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Because of the seasonality in some businesses, the CCC for the TTM period may not be strictly comparable to the fiscal-year periods shown in the chart. Even the steadiest-looking businesses on an annual basis will experience some quarterly fluctuations in the CCC. To get an understanding of the usual ebb and flow at Landauer, consult the quarterly-period chart below.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FQ = fiscal quarter.

On a 12-month basis, the trend at Landauer looks good. At 86.8 days, it is 2.5 days better than the five-year average of 89.3 days. The biggest contributor to that improvement was DPO, which improved 10.0 days compared to the five-year average. That was partially offset by a 6.3-day increase in DIO.

Considering the numbers on a quarterly basis, the CCC trend at Landauer looks good. At 68.1 days, it is 18.3 days better than the average of the past eight quarters. With both 12-month and quarterly CCC running better than average, Landauer gets high marks in this cash-conversion checkup.

Though the CCC can take a little work to calculate, it's definitely worth watching every quarter. You'll be better informed about potential problems, and you'll improve your odds of finding the underappreciated home run stocks that provide the market's best returns.

  • Add Landauer to My Watchlist.

Stocks to Watch: Stocks to watch Friday: AIG, Sears, Deckers

CHICAGO (MarketWatch) � Shares of Salesforce.com Inc., Deckers Outdoor Corp., American International Group Inc. and Sears Holding Corp. could be among actively traded issues on Friday.

Salesforce.com CRM �was up 8.2% in after-hours trading after the online business-software developer said fourth-quarter adjusted earnings were 43 cents a share on revenue of $631.9 million. Analysts polled by FactSet Research were expecting earnings of 40 cents a share on revenue of $624 million.

Deckers Outdoor DECK �shares were down more than 10% after the footwear maker cautioned that 2012 earnings would be diminished by about $1.40 a share due to ongoing increases in sheepskin costs. �We continue to pursue all available opportunities to further mitigate the impact of cost pressures and based on our initial visibility, we expect to experience relief beginning in 2013,� the company stated. Deckers Outdoor, whose brands include Ugg Australia, reported fourth-quarter results that topped most Wall Street forecasts.

Insurance giant AIG AIG �gained 2.3% in evening trading as the company said fourth-quarter operating profit was 82 cents a share, above Wall Street�s consensus estimate of 63 cents a share.

Sears Holding Corp. SHLD �shares surged 19% on Thursday, making it the biggest gainer in the S&P 500, after the company reassured investors about its liquidity and financial position despite racking up a string of losses amid a sales decline. See full story.

Department store titan J.C. Penney Co. Inc. JCP �is expected to report a fourth-quarter profit of 68 cents a share on revenue of $5.5 billion.

Newmont Mining Corp. NEM �is expected to report a fourth-quarter profit of $1.27 a share on revenue of $2.74 billion.

Advertising behemoth Interpublic Group of Cos. IPG �is seen posting a profit of 39 cents a share in the fourth quarter, on revenue of $2.08 billion.

Electric utility Pepco Holdings Inc. POM �is expected to post a fourth-quarter profit of 18 cents a share on revenue of $1.75 billion.

Washington Post Co. WPO �is expected to report fourth-quarter earnings of $6.32 a share on revenue of $1.04 billion.

Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc. ENDP �is seen posting fourth-quarter earnings of $1.32 a share on sales of $803.4 million.

Forex Teaches Trading Without Training Wheels

Trading isn't something one can learn through reading books or research alone. Like riding a bicycle or jumping into the deep end of a pool, it's something you've got to engage in to actually understand. There's no substitute for on-the-job training.

And if you want to actively buy and sell, there's simply no substitute for spot foreign exchange, a high risk but intoxicatingly addictive asset class which barely existed in its current form just a few years ago. It's like manna from investor heaven.

For the nearly 30 years after the end of WW II, global exchange rates were fixed to the US dollar, a scheme which remained in place until August 15, 1971, when President Nixon dropped the U.S. dollar convertibility to gold, leading to an irreversible breakdown of the system of fixed exchange rates and opened the door to the free float of major world currencies.

Trading those currencies was for decades almost exclusively the domain of banks and institutional investors, along with a relatively small number of investors who traded futures contracts based on currencies such as those listed at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) .

That dynamic has changed dramatically, however, as advancements in technology opened up spot FX to nearly anybody. More than any other asset class, it offers exactly what most active traders want: volatility, action and surprisingly small capital requirements.

What likely appeals most to active traders is the action. Foreign exchange is the world's most liquid asset class, a nearly 24-hour market that's just as active at 9 p.m. most weeknights as it is at 9 a.m. most mornings. Consider that, even with pre- and post-market activity, stocks are still only open about 8 hours a day. Foreign exchange literally never stops: from Sunday afternoon to the following Friday night, there's nearly always something moving.

There is a learning curve to FX. After all, stock investing is a fairly straightforward process. Buy 100 shares of Microsoft (MSFT) and you own an equity (ownership) interest in the company. Your profit (or loss) is determined to the extent Microsoft either rises or falls, along with any dividend the company pays over period you own the stock. We're all quite familiar with that game.

Currency trading involves speculating on the price relationship between two different entities, simultaneously buying one currency while selling another with the hope that one buys a currency that will appreciate relative to the currency that has been sold.

So while stocks are quoted simply in terms of share price, currencies are quoted relative to one another. When referencing the value of the U.S. dollar against the Swiss Franc, for example, a recent quote would be somewhere around USD/CHF=0.9312

The quote specifies how many Swiss Francs you have to pay to buy one U.S. dollar or, conversely, how many U.S. dollars you'd get when you'd sell one Swiss Franc. In a currency pair, the first currency quoted, usually the U.S. dollar, is referred to as the base currency. The second currency, in this case, the Swiss Franc, is referred to as the quote currency.

If you wanted to wager the U.S. dollar would rise against the Swiss Franc, you'd go long (buy) the USD/CHF pair. Conversely, if you felt the U.S. dollar would weaken relative to the Swiss Franc, you'd short USD/CHF. There are literally dozens of active FX pairs, many of which like GBP/JPY (British pound/Japanese yen) or AUD/NZD (Australian dollar/New Zealand dollar), don't involve the U.S. dollar at all.

And unlike stocks or futures contracts, spot FX generally doesn't involve trading with other investors directly, but with dealers like Gain Capital (GCAP) or FXCM (FXCM), who maintain a continuous two-way market to buy or sell anywhere from $1 to $100,000 or more worth of currency.

Most FX platforms charge no commission to buy or sell, rather the trader simply pays the spread between the bid and offer for each currency pair. The more actively traded currencies have more tightly quoted spreads and the best chance for success.

Stock investors will spend hours or even days researching companies, evaluating management or new products. In foreign exchange, however, you're not buying or selling shares in a company, but the relationship between two different currencies, a complex and inherently unstable relationship that lends itself to a shorter-time horizon.

We often let stock trades become investments, waiting for underwater positions to recover for months or even years. When a foreign exchange position is moving against you, you're rightfully not thinking about the country's GDP, president or long-term prospects, but your own position, margin and tolerance for risk.

The detachment and indifference to the underlying asset is actually a major benefit in that it permits one to learn the patience and market psychology of how to trade, including the basics of money management and controlling risk. And because most of the platforms have relatively low capital requirements, one can experience trial by market fire with an aggressive portion of their assets rather than the whole nest egg.

In the mid-1990s, I was interviewed for an MTV documentary, which captured several shots of my then-state-of-the-art QuoTrek receiver, which used FM signals to receive crude price quote on stocks and foreign exchange.

Now smartphone apps like those from Oanda offer institutional-quality foreign exchange trading from literally the palm of one's hand, something that was unthinkable even a few years ago.

FX isn't a clandestine road to riches. But for aggressive investors looking to actively trade a portion of their portfolio, it's the world's best game.

Jonathan Hoenig is managing member at Capitalistpig Hedge Fund LLC

Look to diversify in times of financial turmoil: Roongta    

Given the volatility in financial markets worldwide, personal finance expert Harshvardhan Roongta of Roongta Securities says that investors should look to diversify their investments.

In an interview to CNBC-TV18, Roongta advices investors to bet on funds that invest in equities, debt and commodities as well. �Track the fund over a period of time and take a call accordingly after two years,� he added.

However, he adds that if one�s time horizon is limited, they should look at safer investments like recurring deposits or post office savings.

Below is an edited transcript of his interview. Also watch the accompanying video.

Q: Investor is a student who wants to invest Rs 3000 per month to earn Rs 1 lakh at the end of two years. How should he allocate his money?

A: He is the only earning member and has three dependents, and considering the time horizon that he has which is only about two years from now, equity would not be an appropriate asset class for him.

I am going to suggest him to invest the entire Rs 3000 into recurring deposit with his existing bank or he could approach a local post office. The corpus that he will accumulate after two years is about Rs 75,000-80,000. Going in for equity at this juncture may not be appropriate for him. So he should invest into safe investments because the time horizon is two years by choosing a recurring with his bank or a post office.

Q: Investor can invest Rs 4000 per month, how should he allocate his money?

A: He has a time horizon of five years and he wants to accumulate a corpus of Rs 15 lakhs in five years. The first thing is with an investment of Rs 4000 per month over a period of five years, Rs 15 lakh cannot be accumulated. Even if we were to assume a 14% CAGR, the corpus that I see him accumulating is about Rs 3.5 lakh. But never the less, it�s a good habit to start early, it�s a good habit to form which is to save and invest for a targeted goal. So he can start with whatever he has in hand today.

Given the turmoil in the equity markets, both domestically as well as the situation globally, I would recommend him to invest on Axis Triple Advantage Fund . He can choose a growth option. Now this fund has a mandate to invest equally between equity, debt and gold. So if this is his only investment to begin with, he can choose this fund and then track it over a period of time and take a call accordingly after two years from now.

  

Will China Mobile Help You Retire Rich?

Now more than ever, a comfortable retirement depends on secure, stable investments. Unfortunately, the right stocks for retirement won't just fall into your lap. In this series, I look at 10 measures to show what makes a great retirement-oriented stock.

If you're looking for a company with a stranglehold over the most populous nation in the country, China Mobile (NYSE: CHL  ) is a reasonable bet. With commanding market share over its domestic peers and roughly 650 million subscribers, China Mobile has done an excellent job of getting Chinese residents onto its mobile phone network. But can the telecom giant continue to hold off competition in the ever-growing market? Below, we'll revisit how China Mobile does on our 10-point scale.

The right stocks for retirees
With decades to go before you need to tap your investments, you can take greater risks, weighing the chance of big losses against the potential for mind-blowing returns. But as retirement approaches, you no longer have the luxury of waiting out a downturn.

Sure, you still want good returns, but you also need to manage your risk and protect yourself against bear markets, which can maul your finances at the worst possible time. The right stocks combine both of these elements in a single investment.

When scrutinizing a stock, retirees should look for:

  • Size. Most retirees would rather not take a flyer on unproven businesses. Bigger companies may lack their smaller counterparts' growth potential, but they do offer greater security.
  • Consistency. While many investors look for fast-growing companies, conservative investors want to see steady, consistent gains in revenue, free cash flow, and other key metrics. Slow growth won't make headlines, but it will help prevent the kind of ugly surprises that suddenly torpedo a stock's share price.
  • Stock stability. Conservative retirement investors prefer investments that move less dramatically than typical stocks, and they particularly want to avoid big losses. These investments will give up some gains during bull markets, but they won't fall as far or as fast during bear markets. Beta measures volatility, but we also want a track record of solid performance as well.
  • Valuation. No one can afford to pay too much for a stock, even if its prospects are good. Using normalized earnings multiples helps smooth out one-time effects, giving you a longer-term context.
  • Dividends. Most of all, retirees look for stocks that can provide income through dividends. Retirees want healthy payouts now and consistent dividend growth over time -- as long as it doesn't jeopardize the company's financial health.

With those factors in mind, let's take a closer look at China Mobile.

Factor

What We Want to See

Actual

Pass or Fail?

Size Market cap > $10 billion $218 billion Pass
Consistency Revenue growth > 0% in at least four of five past years 5 years Pass
Free cash flow growth > 0% in at least four of past five years 4 years Pass
Stock stability Beta < 0.9 0.53 Pass
Worst loss in past five years no greater than 20% (41.7%) Fail
Valuation Normalized P/E < 18 12.92 Pass
Dividends Current yield > 2% 3.8% Pass
5-year dividend growth > 10% 14.2% Pass
Streak of dividend increases >= 10 years 7 years Fail
Payout ratio < 75% 41.8% Pass
Total score 8 out of 10

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Total score = number of passes.

Since we looked at China Mobile last year, the company has kept its eight-point score. The mobile provider has also seen strong, share-price growth, which is especially impressive as the Chinese stock market has struggled.

China Mobile has a big chunk of the Chinese telecom market. But one concern that investors have is that China Mobile's strength comes largely from the older 2G phone market. In more advanced 3G phones, it has a much smaller 43% market share.

Interestingly, China Mobile has thrived even without the iPhone. Limitations in network compatibility forced Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) to go with competing providers China Unicom (NYSE: CHU  ) and China Telecom (NYSE: CHA  ) instead. But if Apple follows through with technology expected to allow its upcoming iPhone 5 to work on China Mobile's TD-SCDMA network, then it could open the door to huge additional growth.

Meanwhile, other handset makers are trying to get their fingers into the market, which should help boost China Mobile's position as well. Microsoft and Nokia (NYSE: NOK  ) have looked into bringing their own smartphone lines to China, where they could go up against Apple and other phone makers. With its dominant position, China Mobile will have significant leverage in defining the terms of all of its relationships with phone providers.

For retirees and other conservative investors, China Mobile is a relatively safe play in what has been a turbulent market lately. The telecom company certainly faces some challenges, but overall, investors looking for a stock with Chinese exposure could do far worse than choosing China Mobile.

Keep searching
Finding exactly the right stock to retire with is a tough task, but it's not impossible. Searching for the best candidates will help improve your investing skills, and teach you how to separate the right stocks from the risky ones.

If you really want to retire rich, no one stock will get the job done. Instead, you need to know how to prepare for your golden years. The Motley Fool's latest special report will give you all the details you need to get a smart investing plan going, plus it reveals three smart stocks for a rich retirement. But don't waste another minute -- click here and read it today.

Add China Mobile to My Watchlist, which will aggregate our Foolish analysis on it and all your other stocks.

Friday, June 22, 2012

Goldman Ups Disney, News Corp.; Cuts Viacom, Time-Warner

Goldman Sachs analyst James Mitchell this morning shuffled his ratings on the major media stocks.

Upgrades:

  • Disney (DIS): To Buy, from Neutral, with $42 price target. “We see parks and studio fueling a 2010-2011 upswing, and dominant assets within global growth categories (ESPN in sports viewing, Disney World in parks, Pooh and Princesses in consumer products) driving long term expansion,” he writes.
  • News Corp. (NWSA): To Buy, from Neutral, with a $17 price target, citing “sector-low multiples, a history of share gains within categories offsetting unfashionable category mix, and catalysts in Fox News renewals and FOX retrans / reverse retrans contributions.”

Downgrades:

  • Viacom (VIAA): To Neutral, from Buy, “due to price performance and less-well-understood secular
    growth opportunities than we see at some entertainment peers.”
  • Time-Warner (TWX): To Neutral, from Buy, largely based on the view that there are better opportunities elsewhere. “We believe Time Warner has built an attractive portfolio of cable nets, with
    a market-leading movie studio and magazine publisher,” he writes. “However, among entertainment majors, we favor Disney for 2010-2011 growth (parks and studio recoveries) and secular expansion (differentiated consumer products, parks, ESPN), and News Corp. for value, retrans, and international cable net growth.”

With the stock market getting battered today, all four stocks are trading lower today:

  • DIS is off 62 cents, or 1.9%, to $32.60.
  • NWSA is off 46 cents, or 3.6%, to $12.21.
  • VIA is off $1.71, or 4.5%, to $36.12.
  • TWX is off 89 cents, or 2.9%, to $29.62.

Disclosure: News Corp. is the publisher of this blog.

3 New ETFs ‘Give Back’ — for Better or Worse

After a weeklong lull that saw no exchange-traded funds go live, three new products launched last week that all focus on giving a little back — with some twists.

On the seemingly moral upside is the AdvisorShares Global Echo ETF (NYSE:GIVE), which is a multi-focused, actively managed fund geared toward �sustainable and impact investment opportunities.�

9 Tech Stocks Nearing Dangerous Territory

The fund�s focuses, by asset allocation, include domestic equities (33%), foreign equities (19%), short exposure (15%) and fixed income (5%), with the remaining quarter-plus of the fund in cash. The multi-pronged approach is aimed at reducing fund volatility.

Speaking about the sustainable focus of GIVE, Advisor Shares says �

�GIVE is designed as a core allocation that proactively seeks opportunities in Sustainable Investment themes while reducing volatility. The fund will allocate capital to equity and debt securities of [publicly] traded companies who have a proactive and meaningful sustainability mandate, as well as securities that may technologically, socially and environmentally impact the earth positively, with a focus on themes such as water, clean energy, innovation and other sustainable themes as defined by the portfolio managers.�

AdvisorShares also will donate 0.4% of its 1.7% management fee to the Global Echo Foundation, which is dedicated to a number of causes, including solving social issues that affect women and children, environmental conservation and supporting micro-enterprises.

This ETF follows in the steps of several other “socially responsible investing” funds, such as the iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social Index Fund (NYSE:DSI) or iShares MSCI USA ESG Select Social Index Fund (NYSE:KLD), which track indices focusing on companies’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors.

The other two products that went live last week were UBS�s Etracs Monthly Pay 2x Leveraged Dow Jones Select Dividend Index ETN (NYSE:DVYL) and Etracs Monthly Pay 2x Leveraged S&P Dividend ETN (NYSE:SDYL). These two exchange-traded notes aim to double the returns and dividends of their respective dividend-focused indices.

I discussed these funds at length last week, but the short take is that they�re risky investment vehicles using dividends to lure in income investors. And I�m not the only one on that train. Other commentaries and discussions about these ETNs� focus on the dividend crowd have used terms like �war crime� and �capital punishment� to reflect disgust. Hyperbolic, sure, but certainly not unwarranted.

Last week�s additions put May�s total of launches at six. To date, 111 new funds have started up this year, according to XTF.com.

Kyle Woodley is the assistant editor of InvestorPlace.com. As of this writing, he did not hold a position in any of the aforementioned securities. Follow him on Twitter at @KyleWoodley.

The Fed Statement: Economy Still Flatlining

The para­mount inno­va­tion in the Fed­eral Reserve’s state­ment yes­ter­day was that it will keep inter­est rates low until at least the mid­dle of 2013. The truth of the mat­ter is that our econ­omy is like a patient on the oper­at­ing table whose heart has stopped and the doc­tors are scram­bling to get it going again. And the Fed’s state­ment yes­ter­day reveals that the Fed rec­og­nizes the patient’s heart is still not beat­ing, and it's employ­ing no new mea­sures to try and get it beat­ing again.

Did any­one really expect the Fed to announce it would raise rates any­time in the near future? The state­ment con­firms my point in yesterday’s postthat the Fed is out of bul­lets. What else can it do to address our eco­nomic woes except keep rates low for even longer?

Also of inter­est is the market’s reac­tion to the Fed’s state­ment. How is the fact that the econ­omy is doing so poorly that we will need close to zero inter­est rates for another two years good news? Funny, I remem­ber the same pun­dits who cheered yesterday’s Fed state­ment say­ing ear­lier this year that they were bull­ish on stocks because they expected the Fed’s next move was likely to raise rates sooner than expected in response to the econ­omy doing bet­ter than expected. So, again, how is it good that rates will be kept lower for longer?

The best news out of the state­ment is that there is at least some dis­sen­sion. I am not sure on what side of the issues the dis­senters stand. How­ever, the dis­sen­sion gives me hope that there is at least some recog­ni­tion that keep­ing inter­est rates low under­mines the long-term eco­nomic growth poten­tial of our economy. The longer we allow cap­i­tal to flow to lower-return invest­ments, the less cap­i­tal is avail­able for higher returns invest­ments. Our eco­nomic growth is slower; there are fewer jobs; there is less demand/consumption; and there is less cap­i­tal to allo­cate to higher-return opportunities

It is clear that low rates for extended peri­ods of time are not a recipe for the long-term pros­per­ity of our economy. Low rates are like Key­ne­sian stim­u­lus: They can be effec­tive over short peri­ods of time but can do last­ing long-term dam­age if left in place too long. If Mr. Bernanke thinks he has no choice, then I sug­gest he take a look at the riots in the streets in Lon­don. He will see that our sit­u­a­tion can get much worse.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

iRetirement: A safer way to play Apple?


Apple (AAPL) is the greatest cash-generating company the world has ever seen. In just its last quarter, Apple's cash pile grew from $98 billion to $110 billion. And it could add another $40 or $50 billion to that cash by the time we're ringing in 2013.

Meanwhile, sometime in its fourth quarter, which starts July 1, Apple will reward shareholders with the first quarterly installment of its $2.65 annual dividend.�

Apple acknowledged that part of the reason for paying a dividend is to attract retirement investors, including institutional investors who manage income and retirement portfolios. The question is: Is Apple a good stock for individual investors planning who are actively involved in their own retirement planning?� �

Given the rate at which Apple is growing its earnings and cash position -- combined with the attractive valuation (forward P/E of 10) -- it's tough to argue that there isn't upside for both the stock price and the dividend.

But Apple has two things that keep it from being the perfect retirement stock: a $550 share price and a sub-2% dividend. �

So we got busy investigating the best ways that individual investors can use Apple to help fund their retirement. And we've found an investment that's heavily leveraged to Apple Computers, pays 9.3%, and has as much as 10% annual upside. �
In other words, it's such a perfect way to use Apple stock for market-beating returns, we've dubbed this investment (and a few like it) "the iRetirement Plan." �

The Nuveen Equity Premium Advantage (JLA) is closed-end fund that's nearly 12% invested in Apple -- the highest of any fund we've been able to uncover. �

JLA also pays a 9.5% dividend, and trades at a discount to net asset value (NAV) of 11.5%. In addition, management fees are under 1%, which is very good for a closed-end fund with such an attractive dividend. �

The Nuveen Equity Premium Advantage Fund is an equity option fund. That means it sells call options to boost its performance, raise cash for dividend payments, and create a measure of downside protection. The fund's secondary objective is capital appreciation of the stocks it holds. �

Now, we expect that individual investors may have reservations about investing in a fund that uses call options to generate income. Investors should understand that selling call options is a conservative income strategy. �

For the last three years, the Nuveen Equity Premium Advantage Fund has averaged 15.5% gains, while the NAV has risen just 13%. �

Now, it's not unreasonable to think that you might get +20% a year from Apple for the next few years. After all, it's growing earnings at a much faster rate than that. �

The point is for retirement savings, the reliable income and stable share price make the Nuveen Equity Premium Advantage Fund a better option. �

Investors will see the share price rise as Apple's stock price rises. And the fact that the fund generates income with call options means it is less vulnerable to stock market corrections. �

Over the last few weeks, Apple shares have fallen around 15%. But the Nuveen Equity Premium Advantage Fund has performed much better -- down just 2%.

Once Apple starts paying a dividend, that will increase the cash flow to the Nuveen Equity Premium Advantage Fund. It would be reasonable to expect the fund to pass the added income on to shareholders. So the current 9.5% dividend could quickly become 10.5% or even 11%. �

We rate the Nuveen Equity Premium Advantage Fund� a strong buy under $12 a share. We believe it represenst an excellent way for you to collect market-beating dividends and maintain exposure to Apple common stock.�



Related articles:
  • eBay: Profits from PayPal
  • Cash cows in tech: 'Four Horsemen'
  • Oracle: Shelter from the storm
  • Cisco: A no-brainer buy in tech

Take a Risk on Oil: EOG Looks Better than Exxon, Says Goldman

Oil prices have dropped in the past month on fears of weaker global demand and strong supply, but Goldman Sachs analyst Brian Singer expects that the commodity will rebound.

“We reiterate our Attractive coverage view on E&P stocks following a sharp correction over the last two months. Weak oil prices and global growth concerns have superseded resource announcements, pushing down valuations to levels that now reflect around an $85/bbl long-term price. We believe the pullback in oil prices is overdone (our bullish WTI and Brent forecasts are unchanged) and that a combination of rising oil prices, recognition of improving resource bases, and M&A potential can drive outperformance.”

Investors should be more comfortable buying E&P stocks with more risk, or beta, the Goldman analysts argue.

“[W]e believe liquids growth guidance is conservative, and we see potential for upward revisions to resource life that drive multiple expansion despite the share price trading only modestly higher than it did in 2010 prior to the Eagle Ford Shale/Permian horizontal oil plays being unveiled.”

One of those stocks is EOG Resources (EOG), a beaten-down E&P stock that Goldman added to its Conviction List.

The Goldman analysts took Exxon Mobil (XOM), a lower-beta stock, off their conviction list.

Their other favorites include Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD), Noble Energy (NBL), and Devon Energy (DVN).

Are There Any No-Risk Investments?

Risk is something you encounter everyday not just when investing. When most people think of investment risk they tend to think of the loss of their principal sum. But the question is: are there any no-risk investments?

While there are some investments that have less risk than others but there is no investment which is truly risk free. You cannot eliminate risk but you can manage it.

Perhaps if we take a look at the different types of risk it will make it easier to understand.

? Capital Risk is the type of risk that many of us think of and it is the risk of losing your invested money. This can relate to any type of investment from bonds to shares.

? Inflation Risk is the where an investor’s rate of return on investment doesn’t keep pace with the inflation rate. This risk particularly relates to term deposit funds which are normally considered low risk. If the inflation rate were to increase to a percentage higher than your return the real return would be negative.

? Interest Rate Risk is the drop in an investment’s interest rate and once again relates to the more conservative type of investment of term deposits at the bank. Bonds (referred to as fixed interest) also suffer interest rate risk. The prices of bonds move up and down, but not usually as much as shares (also known as stock). While bonds tend to be thought of as a conservative investment their returns can be volatile. If the interest rates go up the bond looses value and a decline in rates means the value goes up. There could be a significant decrease in the overall return of any particular bond because of interest rates. Bonds are a loan to a Corporate, Municipality or Government.

? Market Risk is where an investor sells their investment at a less than desired price and makes a loss such as when the price of shares drops. Shares are owned by you as investor and tend to be volatile.

? Liquidity Risk is the limitation on the availability of funds for a specific period of time. Some investments have penalties for early withdrawal whereas others do not allow withdrawal until a set time. If money is required in a hurry this will affect the investor.

? Default Risk is the failure of the organization where your investment is made. Even capital guaranteed investments are subject to this if the guarantor fails. At one time Sovereign Debt was thought of a ‘risk free’ however there have been defaults in history. And in recent times you only need to look at Iceland, Portugal, Ireland, Greece, and Spain. These countries have given us the acronym PIGS when international bond analysts are referring to faltering or indebted economies.

? Legislative Risk can affect any investment as it is the changes in tax laws and other regulation that may make certain investments less advantageous.

If you are looking for higher returns, you have to be willing to live with higher degree of risk. But as you can see it’s impossible to avoid risk totally. We all know that you can potentially achieve higher returns through shares than with bonds and that bonds achieve higher potential returns rather than cash, but to get higher returns you need to take on some degree of volatility. At the end of the day there are no investments that have no-risk at all.

Lyn Bell has been in the finance industry for more than 30 years and is a Certified Financial Planner. She has helped many clients achieve their financial goals. Sign up to get Lyn’s free newsletter SoundFinance News and receive a free gift.

Please note this article does not contain specific advice and is for information/education purposes.

A disclosure statement is available free on request.

More Good News on Natural Gas

The following video is part of our "Motley Fool Conversations" series, in which analyst John Reeves and advisor David Meier discuss topics across the investing world.

According to a recent report, power generation plants used 40% more gas and 20% less coal in March. David thinks that is one more reason to be bullish on natural gas's future. He also thinks, however, that many energy and production companies like EXCO Resources and Encana carry significant risk. That's why he thinks that UNG may be the best way to play natural gas over the long term, despite all of the volatility.

Energy stocks offer something for all types of investors. Some companies rise and fall with oil prices, while others provide more steady returns over the long haul. The Motley Fool has identified a company that will prosper for years to come. Read more about an energy stock set to soar in our special free report: "The Only Energy Stock You'll Ever Need." Don't miss out on this limited-time offer and your opportunity to discover this under-the-radar company before the market does. Click here to access your report -- it's totally free.

Please enable Javascript to view this video.

Opportunity Is Knocking in Both Gold and Platinum

Some investors in gold, silver and platinum are panicking over big price drops on Thursday, August 4. A lot of weak hands, who speculate across different markets, got hit with huge margin calls as the DOW (DIA) industrials plunged 513 points, with similar losses on the NASDAQ (QQQ) and S&P 500 (SPY) indexes. That caused a big sell-off, which caused a big drop in price as big moneyed short sellers opportunistically sent out their trading bots to capitalize on the event. Big sell offs, however, are not to be feared. They are to be embraced.

Even given probable implicit Federal Reserve backing, and even though they will take every opportunity to make a quick buck… short sellers are too smart to bankrupt themselves trying to prevent gold from rising. They are liquidating short positions into the margin call selling. They know that, in the long run, with repeated episodes of quantitative easing and cash injections by the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, Bank of Japan and the ECB, people are slowly but surely losing more and more faith in fiat currencies, no matter what country happens to print it. The process is just beginning. Even the central bank printers are buying gold, and the manipulative short-selling crowd knows it.

Gold is headed much higher and, in the long run, it is going to lift all precious metals along with it. Russia, Kazakhstan, Greece, Ukraine, Thailand, and Tajikistan added large amounts of goldto their reserves in the past few months. If short sellers at COMEX or the LBMA send out their trading bots to collapse gold prices again, as they did in 2008, they will find an eager group of “speculative” traders to take those new long positions and not give them back. There is nothing that would stop what at first glance might appear to be a mere speculative trader, from having hidden contracts for the sale of gold to various emerging market central banks. They could buy and buy, each limited only to his own speculative position limit, and force the derivatives dealers to physically deliver. That is why it is safer to close short positions, rather than push the envelope.

Aside from that, the wiser minds that exist at the Federal Reserve and its cable of cooperating commercial banks must realize that the only way for the United States to recover and pay back its debt is to debase the current Federal Reserve Note. Some are probably in favor of a continued rise in the price of gold. Given huge gold reserves, if the price of gold rises high enough to cover all American dollars, the U.S. government can eventually switch back to a gold standard, without admitting that it had no choice in order to stabilize the world economy. Quantitative easing is inevitable in order to speed up this process of dollar debasement, although it will probably come, in the future, under another name. Out of the ashes, gold will rise back to its historical status as the world’s only real reserve currency, and that means $10,000+ per troy ounce prices. This process will take years. Prices will fluctuate up and down as western central bank-connected price manipulators unleash trading robots for periodic attacks on the precious metal prices. But, in spite of ups and downs in the short term, as we are now seeing, the overall trend will be sharply higher because that is the only way the price can go, given the unsustainable debt load of all western nations. This will continue over the next 5-10 years at least.

Sometimes, in spite of the fantasy nature of the prices created at futures markets, we can learn things by following them carefully. On July 18, 2011, with the price of platinum hovering around $1,740-60 per ounce, this author made a prediction of a short-term sharp upward movement in platinum prices. Certain anomalies in NYMEX trading flows and a pseudo-backwardation of platinum prices, at that time, made this very likely to happen. The price rise was shorter-term than expected, and not as high, but, a few days later, the probability of large-scale strikes in the South African platinum mines became widespread news. The pricing anomalies described in the article published at that time were probably the result of a deeper knowledge of this situation among short sellers, than among the general investing public. The price of platinum rose into the low $1800s for a while, but has come back down as the likelihood of a settlement grows more real. Yet, even as speculative fervor is falling, strike risk still looms in the South African electricity sector, in the event of which, production of platinum will be crippled, regardless of any direct settlement between mining companies and striking workers. The price may well suddenly rise by a few hundred dollars per ounce, pushed upward by a strike in the platinum mines or in South Africa’s electric plants.

This author occasionally makes comments on the short-term direction of gold, silver and platinum. However, he repeatedly warns people not to risk any more on such speculations than what they would be willing to lose In gambling in Las Vegas. Individuals and non-connected banks, funds, and insurers will never be able to reap big profits by trading daily, weekly or even monthly no matter how accurate they may be on some of the ups and downs. Both profits and basic nest egg security can only be achieved by following long-term trends and gritting one’s teeth when the inevitable bumps hit along the way. Neither small investors, nor banks, insurers and/or funds that are not corruptly connected to Federal Reserve officials, can compete against the small set of players who do have deep and corrupt connections with that entity and the U.S. Treasury, as well as the Bank of England and ECB. Only people who know tomorrow’s news before it happens, and/or are in a position to help create the news, are able to reliably make money from short-term trading. For the rest of us, one big gain will surely be wiped out by the next loss.

With that in mind, there is only one key point that long-term investors can glean from the settlement of the recent labor action in South Africa, and it has nothing to do with timing the platinum and/or gold markets. The key is that the cost structure for gold and, even more so, for platinum miners is continually pressured upward by higher and higher wage demands coupled with ever-increasing commodity and energy prices. The problem of steadily increasing costs is more acute for platinum miners. Platinum is so rare that a lot more ore must be taken from the ground to obtain an equal amount of purified metal, and this costs more to do. For example, if platinum were to fall below $1,650 for a few months running, a platinum shortage would be the immediate result, because several of the high-cost mines would be forced to close. Demand for physical platinum (regardless of what happens in the paper NYMEX and London OTC derivatives markets) would continue to rise quickly, and the price would explode, resulting in the reopening of those mines and profits for platinum investors.

Of all the precious metals, including gold and silver, based on current prices, platinum is likely to rise most over the next 10 years. This is due to a number of important factors, working together. For example, even though overall U.S. passenger cars were uneven in July, 2011, diesel sales in the first half of 2011 amounted to 47,873, exceeding the first half of 2010 by 39%. Right now, in spite of an ongoing process of substitution for gold jewelry as the price of gold rises, catalytic converter manufacturers are the largest platinum users in the world. Diesel engine emission systems require 8 times as much platinum, on average, as gasoline engines.

Some people think that diesel is a phenomenon affecting only the upper end of the car market, but this is not true. Mid-priced auto maker, Volkswagen (VLKAF.PK), has seen increased sales volume of 42%, indicating clearly that diesel buyers are not confined to high income groups interested only in luxury vehicles. If we make a conservative assumption that sales will continue to increase at about this pace, without consideration of the fact that more diesel models are being announced for the North American market, about 108,249 small diesel passenger vehicles will be sold in 2011. This is 39% higher than 2010 total of 77,877.

Given a steady rise in gasoline prices, inherently greater efficiency of diesel engines, continuingly deeper American market penetration by the Volkswagen brand, and the new diesel models being announced for 2011 by Fiat-Chrysler, the 2011 numbers could end up higher than that. Meanwhile, Ford Motor Company (F) introduced a diesel powered Ford Fiesta to the U.K. market, in 2008, that gets 73 mpg. It vowed, at that time, and many times afterward, that it did not intend to ever release a small diesel car in America. Ford is now back peddling. On August 1, 2011, a Ford executive stated, publicly for the first time, that the company intends to introduce diesel powered cars, “if there’s market demand.” Obviously, based on the sales increase at all auto makers who already sell small diesel cars in America, the market demand exists. We expect Ford to introduce some of its very successful European diesel models into the US market very soon.

A Fiat-Chrysler diesel engine debuted in America in June 2011, and a diesel version of the Chevrolet (GM) Cruze will be available in 2013. Mazda (MZDAF.PK) has announced that its so-called “SKY-D clean diesel” will also be on sale in North America during the 2013 model year. Many more diesel models are planned for the American market to meet new Congressional fuel efficiency standards (CAFÉ). With the high price of oil likely to continue in the long run, regardless of sharp reversals in the shorter term, and as government “miles-per-gallon” requirements rise, new models will stream out of Audi, Volkswagen, Chrysler-Fiat, Mazda, General Motors and Toyota (TM). Fiat says it will offer the newly debuted American turbo-diesel, as an option on light-duty trucks, in over 40 countries.

J.D. Power & Associates estimates that North American market share of small diesel engines will more than double from 3.1 percent in 2011 to 7.4 percent by 2017. This translates to about 888,000 diesel vehicles (assuming U.S. production stalls at 12 million per year in spite of population increases), and an increase of 516,000 diesel cars in America alone. Because palladium cannot be fully substituted as a diesel catalyst, each vehicle will require an average of 8 grams of platinum per catalytic converter, compared with only 1 gram in a gasoline vehicle’s emission system. From the standpoint of platinum demand, this is the functional equivalent of a net increase in platinum demand of 133,000 troy ounces.

The calculation we have just engaged in involved ONLY American car sales. Auto industry executives in India, as well as similar emerging economies, predict an exponential increase in the market share of diesel-powered passenger vehicles. For example, Suzuki-India’s chief general manager of marketing and sales, Shashank Srivastava, says that while diesel powered engines accounted for 23% of India’s car sales in the 2005 model year, they currently amount to about 30%, and are expected to rise to 45 to 50% of total sales, within 3-4 years.

According to Wikipedia, India produced 3.7 million units in 2010. Of these, 30% were diesel powered, or 1,110,000. With a sharp rise in lending rates caused by the Indian central bank’s attempt to righten credit, Indian car production did fall in July, 2011. However, it rose by 33.9% in 2010. Now that the central bank sees that its efforts have led to a slowing of growth greater than expected, it is likely to ease up. Assume that vehicle production growth moderates to 10% per year. If we assume that the percentage market share of diesel increases as industry sources say it will, by 2015, slightly less than 1 million additional diesel-powered vehicles will be produced each year.

The Indian government imposed more stringent “Euro 4” standards as of 2010. This compares to the even more stringent Euro 5 standard imposed by the EU nations as of September 2009. But, research indicates that a Euro 4 diesel catalytic converter on average requires a platinum load of approximately 6 grams compared with 8 grams for a Euro 5 converter. It is entirely likely that India will raise its standard to Euro 5 by 2015, but even if we ignore that probability, a minimum of 190,000 extra troy ounces of additional platinum will be needed to service the needs of India’s expanding light duty diesel production.

We have now shown that with no overall auto sales growth in America, and minimal growth in India, those two nations, alone, will require an additional 323,000 troy ounces of platinum per year by 2017. The net will probably be higher than that, because we have extrapolated to 2017, whereas the Indian numbers will continue to rise, after 2015. Add in China, and the rest of the developing world, and we will probably need another 300,000 ounces. But, to this we must add another 750,000 to 1 million ounces per year, because of new requirements that heavy off-road diesel vehicles be fitted with catalytic converters in both North America and Japan. Platinum mining supply has stagnated for the last 10 years in the 6.1 million ounce range, in spite of quadrupled prices. If will be nearly impossible to find well over 1 million ounces of additional platinum supply by 2017, without huge price increases above and beyond the level of general inflation.

Indeed, Euro 6 standards are set to go into effect by September, 2014, in the EU nations. That is going to require even more platinum (and palladium also). Meeting the stringent air quality standards of Euro 6 is going to require an even higher weighting of platinum in every diesel engine catalytic converter, perhaps more than 10 grams of platinum per average vehicle converter. Thus, even if diesel sales in Europe go down and this is not likely in light of big sales increases in the eastern part of the union, the net platinum demand in Europe is likely to be up or, at the very least, flat.

Yet, as we noted above, getting both gold and platinum out of the ground is getting more expensive every year. The easily available ore has already been mined, and existing mines must be dug ever deeper. Lower quality deposits are now being developed into mines, and, in spite of prices that have hovered between $1,700 and $1,850 per ounce, at least one company has recently abandoned a new platinum deposit because the current price does not warrant its development. Threatened non-compensated expropriation of shareholder property, in favor of “indigenization” is a huge problem in Zimbabwe. Threats of compensated nationalization inhibits new gold and platinum mine development in South Africa. Digging mines deeper and opening new mines for lower quality ores involve increased energy and labor costs. South African workers are demanding wage increases of 10-15% per year, the electric company there is raising rates astronomically every year, and prices for all commodity inputs needed to run a mine have been soaring into the stratosphere. But, whereas there is a huge quantity of above-ground gold to buffer this inability to increase mine production in South Africa and elsewhere, there is very little platinum available except from mining and recycling used catalytic converters.

Central bankers and investors keep buying gold, and rightfully so. They are working together, unwittingly, to push up the price of gold very quickly. It will take at least 5-10 years for the western world to recover from its debt bomb, and probably a lot longer. During that period of time, it is almost certain that, on balance, the price of gold is going to continue rising. The price premium for platinum over gold has dropped to a historically low level of just $70 per troy ounce as this article is being written. This dramatic alteration of a long standing price relation, between the two metals, is not going unnoticed by savvy jewelry buyers. White gold is now the dominant metal used in wedding and engagement rings all over the world and represents about 7% of the gold jewelry market. Few people, however, are going to buy white gold if they can buy platinum for only a tiny price premium. Women are already switching to platinum. Platinum jewelry demand is surging in the Indianmarket, which also happens to be one of the key physical demand centers driving up the price of gold. Jewelers say that “the price of gold is selling platinum.” Platinum jewelry demand even rose 40% in the USA while rising 80% in China during the 1st quarter of 2011.

When thinking about investing in platinum, one must accept high volatility in the short term. This is partially governed by the same capricious manipulation by big banks and hedge funds that gold suffers through, although, occasionally, in the platinum market, the manipulation is on the upside. The volatility is heightened by changing requirements of the industries that platinum serves. Platinum is 15 times rarer than gold, and it is traded in a market that has less liquidity. Historically, though not recently, this market situation has added to the volatility by amplifying upward and downward movement. Naturally, because of the size of the market, it is easier for a big player to manipulate short term prices upward and downward, or prevent them from moving sharply in either direction, so as to stabilize prices, if that is the desire.

The fundamentals underlying all the precious metals, and especially platinum, are very sound. The intense stupidity that characterizes trading on NYMEX and the London OTC derivatives markets should be viewed for what it is. Speculative players move short-term prices of all commodities up and down with a complete disregard for the fundamentals of supply and demand, and rely upon rumor, fear and misinformation, being “stopped out” by big bank manipulators, and suffering from margin call liquidation to guide their trades. That is why they non-Fed-connected ones generally lose money and only a few select market makers and their associated hedge funds make money in the derivatives casinos.

Speculators are mostly short-term momentum chasers who are now being forced to sell precious metals to meet margin calls on stock investments they have also chased. Industrial demand for platinum and silver continues rising, while investment demand for physical gold is stronger than ever among banks, individual investors and even central bankers. But, because the world still believes that the prices created in London and New York are real, rather than fantasy prices, well-capitalized physical buyers can benefit from the travails of the paper market.

In the case of platinum, smart investors should keep in mind what most of the speculators do not understand. Platinum is intrinsically linked to gold. Gold prices rise when economic conditions are unstable. That means that the yellow metal is going to rise in value whether we eventually experience high inflation or deep deflation. Meanwhile, the substitution of platinum for white and yellow gold can and will more than compensate for any foreseeable loss of catalytic converter demand.

Most long side COMEX and NYMEX traders do not understand the linkage between platinum and gold. Short-side manipulators can and do scare platinum speculators out of the market at will just by emphasizing the industrial demand issue. The current panicked liquidation, however, is being driven by high leverage among the “pie-in-the-sky” get rich quick speculators. They are being flushed out of the market, not because they want to be, but because they are using the liquidity and built-in profits from precious metals speculations to cover losing bets in suddenly collapsing equities markets. The flushing out of such speculators also occurred in March 2009, and, when they were finally fully flushed into the monetary toilet, the precious metals complex surged upward. Flushing over-leveraged speculators is temporarily painful for real investors because so much of the world still believes that the fantasy prices created at derivatives markets are real prices. However, it is good news in the long run, and provides opportunities for physical buyers to get metal cheaper than they would, otherwise.

Events like the big price drop on August 4, are not to be feared, but, rather, they are the “big dips” that this writer has always encouraged people to buy into. The fact that gold prices dropped only marginally speaks strongly to fear of central bank demand and the fears of short sellers. They are covering their shorts into the liquidation panic of the long buyers. The only problem for well-capitalized buyers is finding an appropriate price to buy into this big dip. If prices continue to fall opportunities, of course, will get even better. But, timing one’s purchases perfectly is nearly impossible. Forget about it. Pick an acceptable price you can live with, and buy.

Prices may drop lower than where you buy in, just as they did back in March, 2009, but such a thing happens to the best investors who reap the biggest profits. Don’t worry about it. If prices drop below what you paid and you still have money left, buy more. Feel secure in the knowledge that prices will surely recover and more. It won’t really matter, in the long run, whether you buy gold at $1,550 or $1,650, or if you buy platinum at $1,650 or $1,750. If you are a long-term investor (and if you do not have corrupt connections to the Federal Reserve, you’d better be a long-term investor), just feel secure in knowing that, over the next 5-10 years, the price of both metals will rise to levels that are now unthinkable.

As I wrote in a previous article, a position in platinum can be taken using a number of different financial products:

You can buy small bars or coins at most coin shops, or secure larger wholesale sized bars from Fidelity Investments, which can send it to your home by FedEx if you ask them. Another option is to buy the ETFS Platinum Trust (PPLT), but a negative is that, like other such arrangements, including GLD and SLV, you pay a hefty 0.5% administrative fee every year. Another possibility is to invest in futures positions long at NYMEX. Going the NYMEX route, however, means dealing with what appears to be periodic attempts to "harvest" performance bonds by abruptly changing requirements, selling enormous quantities of short positions, and thereby kicking people out of their positions using margin calls, and stop loss order cascade triggering techniques. If you do buy at the futures markets, you can roll over your investment each 3 months, but that involves paying a very heavy administrative fee for paper platinum that may never exist. Or, you can take delivery, as JP Morgan Chase bank has chosen to do on its own behalf or that of its clients.

You can invest in the stock of a number of different companies that mine platinum, including Stillwater Mining (SWC) as well as the ordinary shares (or ADRs if you are American) of Lonmin (LNMIY.PK), Anglo-American (AAUKY.PK), North American Palladium (PAL) and others...

Platinum is currently a considerably better buy than gold, with more upside potential, because the first thing that investors turn to is gold in unstable times. Most investors do not understand that platinum will be in deep shortage by 2015, even if the American economy does very poorly, and most do not yet appreciate the deep link between gold and platinum prices in the longer term. For more information on how to invest in platinum, see articles here, here, and here.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

HSBC Online Savings Account Interest Rate – Tips to Invest

In case of HSBC savings bank account you have several investment schemes. All the investment plans have been introduced keeping in mind your capacity and benefits in future. Online investment plans in case of HSBC bank differ according to the type of investment you are panning to make. Remember, not everybody have similar spending capacity.

Some can invest more and some can invest less. Thus, this is the most crucial deciding factor in availing the best online investment plan. The offers made by the bank are differentiated and customized based on your investment capacity so that you can make some better gains in the long run. They have their advisory service team who works best in providing information regarding several stocks and sectors and you can receive daily stock market reports for your benefit of investment.

In this case you can make an investment sitting in the comfort of your home. No visiting banks and no waiting in queues. You just need to press a button and you get all information at the tip of your finger. Yes, internet gives you an access to this facility. You can make all your investment work done online. Gathering information, making comparisons, judging interest rates, all can be done on net. Technology has made it easy for you to go online, compare rates of interest and then make an investment based upon your spending capacity. Here you can place the order directly. There is no need for you to spend hours in filling up forms and going through details. Such an online investment plan has indeed made things quite easy for you.

There are several tips of investing money in case of Online Savings Account and receive the best interest ever. First, make a plan and invest to your utmost. You do not know how much you would be able to invest in future. Thus waste no more time and make your best investment today. You also need to invest regularly following a particular method. If you do this you are surely going to be on the better side. You can invest in time but never make a mistake of timing the market. In this case you should act as a smart investor. You need to be have patience if you have gone for a long term investment plan. The more the time, the lesser the risks and the greater will be the gains – this is the ultimate motto of HSBC Online Savings Account investment plan and rate of interest.

Next Step: Find the latest Savings Account Rates.
Click here for the latest ——->> Savings Account Rates.
Balajee Kannan
http://www.bestsavingsaccountrates.net/.

Thursday, June 21, 2012

Clearing Houses: The Devil Is Still in the Details

This morning’s recon mission for derivatives-related stories turned up bumper crop of realizations that should have been painfully obvious, but were not made when it could have made a difference–meaning that the real pain is to come.

First, from the FT:

Quite simply, the regulators succumbed to the sheer volume of rulemakings and an avalanche of comments from the industry. There was not enough time to meet the deadline, and it became clear that implementing Dodd Frank was going to be far more complicated than initially thought.

Thought by whom, exactly? We need to know, because anybody who admits to not foreseeing a train wreck should be disqualified from further comment or participation in these matters, (a) for not foreseeing the obvious, and (b) for copping to such cluelessness.

Next, from Financial News. In response to the rhetorical question “Are clearing houses ‘too big to fail’”, Ben Wright writes (heh):

It is a real concern that not enough people have asked this question before now and even more worrying that no one has provide a satisfactory answer. [The answer is almost certainly yes, though I guess that is unsatisfactory substantively.] As the possibility of some form of huge sovereign credit event grows ever-more imminent, a solution need to be found, and fast.

It’s a little late to start thinking about packing a parachute when you’re already 30,000 feet up. But that’s Frank-n-Dodd in a nutshell (with an emphasis on the “nuts”).

Wright also recalls a speech by the BoE’s Paul Tucker (which I blogged about in June), in which this worthy

said clearing houses had to think of themselves as system risk managers and start behaving as such. Clearing houses should, therefore, steer clear of procyclical margin practices, monitor the soundness of their members, and plan for their disappearance.

No disagreements here, except that it is insane to think that CCPs will think of themselves as “system risk managers.” Because they aren’t “the system”, but only part of it. They will act in their interest and the interest of their members. That is quite different from–and often contrary to–acting in the interest of “the system.” Clearing does not internalize most of the key externalities that create systemic risk, and all the wishing and should-ing in the world won’t change that fact.

And from Dow Jones:

Dealers and clearing experts have urged regulators to introduce so-called living wills for clearing houses, warning that a “credible” plan for unwinding critical pieces of market infrastructure is “vital to financial stability”. The comments come amid growing fears that the U.S. government’s inability to raise its debt ceiling could prompt a global credit event.

. . . .

Roger Barton, founder and managing director at Financial Reform Consultancy, said: “It is arguable that the whole issue of clearing house resolution should have been addressed earlier.”

“Arguable”? Go out on a limb there, Roger.

I wonder if it’s possible to fashion a parachute from the seat covers and a few stray blankets in the overhead bins.

Then there’s this article on portability in Risk. It’s long (and gated), but the moral of the story is easily stated: this is a major issue, with systemic implications, but which is totally up in the air. (Lot of company up there.) There’s one on portability in the FT, coming to pretty much the same conclusion.

What, never heard of portability? Apparently the Sorcerer’s Apprentices hadn’t either.

I could go on. In recent days there have been numerous articles about myriad issues in clearing–collateral, margining, capital requirements, and on and on–all of which are (a) unresolved, and (b) of first order systemic importance. All the important details were left to the end–most likely because those that demanded the system remade it, and wrote legislation demanding its remaking didn’t even know what the relevant details are.

An entire system that evolved organically with all of the complexity and interconnectedness that implies is being re-engineered on the fly. Anyone even marginally cognizant of the complexity of the system would have been too humble to even contemplate remaking it root and branch.

But unfortunately, the marginally cognizant weren’t in charge. The imperious, overconfident, ignorant, and foolish were–some were all of the above.

That never works out well.

How Low Can Ctrip.com International Go?

Shares of Ctrip.com International (Nasdaq: CTRP  ) hit a 52-week low on Monday. Let's take a look at how it got there and see whether cloudy skies remain in the forecast.

How it got here
In the online travel booking industry, there's priceline.com (Nasdaq: PCLN  ) and everybody else. With little margin for error in this comparison, Ctrip's most recent earnings report is the primary culprit in its drop. Though shares initially popped after the announcement last month, the stock fell to a 52-week low shortly thereafter as investors further digested the earnings report.

For the quarter, China's largest online travel booking site saw revenue rise 19% to $145 million with net income dropping 28% to just $0.18 per share. Eating into the company's bottom line was a mixture of stock-based compensation (a nasty habit that has caused many China-based companies to miss earnings recently), a 57% rise in general and administrative expenses, and lower realized commissions on both air and hotel bookings despite the increased volumes. This raises many questions, the main one being, "What if Ctrip is losing its pricing power?"

Still, there are reasons to be positive regarding its outlook. The majority of leisure companies that have reported earnings have stated that hotel booking RevPAR -- or revenue �per available room -- and travel demand remains strong globally. Marriott International (NYSE: MAR  ) is one such company that serves as a daily reminder that people are still spending, as it forecast RevPAR growth of 6% to 8% in its most recent quarter. In addition, Ctrip has the advantage of being the largest online travel site in the most populated country in the world. It's still in its growth infancy.

How it stacks up
Let's see how Ctrip.com International compares to its peers.

CTRP data by YCharts.

As you can see, Priceline and Expedia (Nasdaq: EXPE  ) have managed to outperform Ctrip and India's MakeMyTrip (Nasdaq: MMYT  ) by a mile. With the latter two in heavily populated countries, growth hiccups seem almost unforgivable to investors.

Company

Price/Book

Price/Cash Flow

Forward P/E

5-Year Revenue CAGR

Ctrip.com International 2.2 9.2 16.0 33.2%
Priceline 11.8 25.3 15.5 31.1%
Expedia 2.8 5.3 13.7 9.0%
MakeMyTrip 4.4 151.7 43.9 34.6%*

Sources: Morningstar and author's calculations. * = denotes two-year CAGR.

Now here's where things get a little bit tricky, because each stock listed above has strengths and weaknesses.

Expedia's costly international expansion came at the expense of a moderate growth rate over the past few years, but it is clearly the cheapest and one of the strongest names poised for future growth.

Conversely, Priceline is much more expensive than its U.S. rival Expedia based on these metrics, but it also has the advantage of having its foot in the international markets for a longer period of time than Expedia. Overall, I consider Expedia a much better value between the two.

MakeMyTrip is still a relatively new company. Currently, its growth rates are enormous and the potential for gaining a huge following in India still exists. However, costs are going through the roof and the company is only marginally cash flow positive at best.

Finally, there's Ctrip, which offers a nice blend of growth and value that combines a little bit of what I see from Priceline and Expedia. Although Ctrip is taking advantage of the Chinese economy's projected 7.5% GDP growth, its pricing power is now in serious question after its booking commissions fell.

What's next
Now for the $64,000 question: What's next for Ctrip.com International? The answer is really going to depend on whether it can control its costs, but more important, whether it can generate higher booking commission.

Our very own CAPS community gives the company a three-star rating (out of five), with an overwhelming 95.6% of members expecting it to outperform. I have yet to personally make a CAPScall on Ctrip.com, as I'm still undecided on whether this is a two-or-three-quarter hiccup, or a bearish new trend in booking commissions.

Clearly Ctrip.com has demonstrated amazing growth and the huge number of potential customers in Asia gives the company a wide audience to target. It's just breaking the tip of the iceberg of what it's capable of. However, a surge in stock-based compensation and expenses has me concerned that shareholders are once again not coming first. I understand the need to expand promotions, but when I don't see that translated into rising air and hotel booking commissions, I get concerned. For now I'm going to hover in wait-and-see mode and revisit Ctrip in three to six months.

If Ctrip.com isn't the stock for you, then perhaps one of these three American companies that are set to dominate the emerging markets is? Click here to get access to our latest special report from Motley Fool Stock Advisor, and find out for free what three stocks could benefit from international exposure.

Craving more input on Ctrip.com International? Start by adding it to your free and personalized watchlist. It's a free service from The Motley Fool to keep you up to date on the stocks you care about most.

Intel, Apple: High Hurdles to Any Foundry Relationship, Says Bernstein

Bernstein Research’s chip analyst Stacy Rasgon and Samsung Electronics (005930KS) analyst Mark Newman and Apple (AAPL) analyst Toni Sacconaghi this morning issue a combined report on the prospects that Intel (INTC) might win foundry business from Apple, concluding that “such a relationship would be fraught with business and strategic issues (on both sides) that would require extremely careful management.”

The authors note that debate has “increased recently” over whether Intel may win some business fabbing Apple’s “A” series processors for its iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch, given the chip maker’s “significant capacity additions” and the constraints at other chip foundries, including Samsung’s.

Although Intel is substantially increasing capital spending on its factories, with $12.95 billion projected for next year, up from $12.55 billion this year and $10.76 spent last year, that doesn’t necessarily mean Intel will make chips for Apple, despite speculation along those lines. “We disagree with this simplistic line of reasoning � any decision to enter foundry will be a strategic choice, independent and distinct from Intel’s current capex strategy.”

Intel has already said that if demand falls short of what they can produce, the company will repurpose chip making assets to the next node, they write.

On the one hand, it’s unlikely Apple would do what Intel wants, which is to shift from using a processor core based on designs from Intel competitor ARM Holdings (ARMH):

We believe a move by Apple to make broad use of x86 in their iOS line is unlikely. We believe that Apple gains significant advantages from their vertically-integrated stack of semiconductor design, software, and hardware – note, for example, that their iPhone 4S, while manufactured at a mature 45nm node, is better on power and performance than virtually all other devices today in a testament to their abilities (Exhibit 5). While access to 22/14/10nm from Intel would provide significant advantages, we believe a move to x86 on iOS would therefore be a non-starter as Apple would lose their ability to optimize the full platform as it currently does with their internal ARM architecture.

However, given the ongoing patent battles with Samsung, Apple has a real need to consider alternatives, the authors write. They might be compelled to consider Intle if Intel could grant a similar “Chinese Wall” between its own processor development and the tabbing of chips for Apple, as long as Intel could gain insights that would benefit its own mobile chip design.

The authors suggest Intel could manage a favorable profit margin on foundry services for Apple that would be comparable to its overall net profit on its own devices, despite having higher costs than the biggest foundry, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM):

Consequently, our analyses suggests that overall foundry net income as a % of revenue could be in the ballpark of 20% or so (Exhibit 15), not hugely different from our current model for Intel as a whole (~23% in 2014), assuming a foundry R&D opex burden at 1.5x the rate of TSMCs (e.g. typical foundry R&D, plus an additional amount to cover design services etc that Samsung provides to Apple, assuming that process R&D etc can be leveraged from Intel’s core business) and minimal incremental SG&A (we assume ~1%) [�] Our base-case modeling suggests entering into a foundry relationship with Apple could drive in the ballpark of 30-35 cents in EPS upside, relatively material (our current 2014 EPS forecast, for instance, is $2.97).

The authors cite multiple issues that would be raised that Intel would have to get past:

Accelerating the performance and/or value proposition of Apple’s iPad via better process technology could increase the risk of PC cannibalization, certainly an undesirable outcome. A similar dynamic could conceivably play out in the mobile space, where Intel is attempting to make their own efforts. Apple’s iPhone is already viewed as being markedly superior to most other platforms; should Intel’s process technology make it even more compelling it may hamper Intel’s own efforts to penetrate the space with their Atom offerings.�We must also be cognizant of the fact that such an arrangement with Apple would open Intel up to significant customer concentration and, potentially, risk given what would likely be dedicated capacity should Apple decide to (again) change foundry partners. Finally, we struggle to see a scenario where the return on capital will ever be as good as Intel’s current business; given they currently earn two margins � a manufacturing and design margin � on their products, their return is extraordinarily high.

Intel shares today are up 23 cents, or 0.9%, at $26.77, Apple shares are down $1.71, or 0.3%, at $570.45, and Samsung shares fell 0.8% to ?1.26 million in Taipei trading.

How High Can Arena Pharmaceuticals Fly?

Shares of Arena Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: ARNA  ) hit a 52-week high on Wednesday. Let's take a look at how it got there and see whether clear skies are still in the forecast.

How it got here
Last year was the year of hepatitis C drug hopefuls; this year it's all about obesity drugs. With Vivus (Nasdaq: VVUS  ) claiming that obesity-related symptoms cost $150 billion each year to treat, can you blame investors for being excited?

Arena Pharmaceuticals' share price has more than doubled a mere month after the company's lead obesity drug, lorcaserin, received a vote of 18-4 in favor of approving the drug given known efficacy and side effects from the Food and Drug Administration's advisory panel. Understandably, the FDA is under no obligation to follow its advisory panel, but it's often a good indicator of whether a drug will be approved or not. Arena holds the rights to the drug worldwide, except for the U.S., where collaborating partner Eisai (OTC: ESALY) holds the marketing rights, pending approval.

The move by the FDA's advisory panel further escalates the battle among Arena's obesity drug contenders: Qnexa from Vivus, Contrave from Orexigen Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: OREX  ) , and the only FDA-approved obesity drug, Xenical, from Roche (OTC: RHHBY), which has side effects that have kept it from being a big success. Being the first to gain approval could mean garnering significant market share in a market where the FDA hasn't approved a new treatment in more than a decade.

The primary deterrents to Arena's share price heading higher would be a delay in its new-drug application, which could give Qnexa a chance to add significant market share and the need for further testing to determine the overall safety profile of lorcaserin. These potential delays likely won't hurt Arena over the long term, but they could seriously derail the current rally.

How it stacks up
Let's see how Arena Pharmaceuticals stacks up next to its peers.

ARNA data by YCharts

It's been a bumpy couple of years for Arena and Orexigen, while Vivus is leaving its peers in the dust.

Normally here I would compare the financial metrics of each company, but as these are clinical-stage biotech companies, that would be rather pointless. Instead, let's dig a bit deeper into each obesity drug candidate.

Orexigen's underperformance can most easily be defined as the length of time it will take to get Contrave to market. Even though its current clinical trials have been hopeful, Contrave is likely two to three years at the earliest away from hitting the market. By then, the need for an additional obesity drug may be a moot point.

Vivus' Qnexa received a resounding nod of approval (20-to-2) from the FDA's advisory panel that practically cleared its way for approval in late February. However, things never go as planned in the biotech sector. Potential safety complications, including increased heart rate and birth defects, are threatening to hold back what seems like the near-guaranteed approval of this effective weight-loss drug. Let's not forget that in 2010, Qnexa was voted down 10-to-6 by the same advisory panel.

Arena's lorcaserin is also facing cardiac safety issues like those currently plaguing Qnexa. Lorcaserin was rejected in 2010 in part because of an elevated incidences of cancer in rats; however, the FDA seems satisfied that the drug doesn't present a cancer risk to humans.

What's next
Now for the $64,000 question: What's next for Arena Pharmaceuticals? That's going to depend on whether the weight-loss results are strong enough and the side effects moot enough to get lorcaserin past the FDA with only post-approval studies on safety required.

Our very own CAPS community gives the company a two-star rating (out of five), with 90.6% of members expecting it to outperform. Personally, I've yet to make a CAPScall on Arena, and you'll need to wait even longer before I make that selection.

I do expect lorcaserin to gain approval from the FDA, but I expect challenges to remain. For one thing, I wouldn't be surprised to see an FDA delay helping Qnexa beat lorcaserin to market. While a delay shouldn't impact the long term success of lorcaserin, it could impact the stock price of Arena in the short term. Two (and here's the big one), I'm worried about those post-approval safety studies. The FDA has brow-beaten diabetes-drug makers into submission with safety testing and that could be the same fate of the obesity drug industry. When the FDA makes its ruling on lorcaserin we'll have a better idea of where it stands on the issue of drug safety, and maybe then I can make a CAPScall one way or the other. Until then, it's just too risky.

Arena Pharmaceuticals clearly has a pipeline that's changing lives. If you'd like the inside scoop on a stock our Motley Fool Rule Breakers team feels could offer the next revolutionary product, click here for your free access to our latest report.

Craving more input on Arena Pharmaceuticals? Start by adding it to your free and personalized watchlist. It's a free service from The Motley Fool to keep you up to date on the stocks you care about most.

Top Stocks For 5/21/2012-13

Cleantech Transit, Inc. (CLNO)

Cleantech Transit, Inc. is in the business of producing and conserving power. They produce and sell clean electricity globally, with a focus on sustainable energies using renewable resources such as Geothermal, Solar and Wind. Cleantech Transit, Inc goal is to use innovative technologies to reduce electricity consumption and dependence on carbon based energy.

Biomass fuel refers to any source of organic material. Organic material is created through the life that exists on earth be it animal or plant. For the majority of Biomass Fuel power plants the main fuel source is plant material.

The sun is a massive nuclear reactor giving off vast amounts of light and heat energy. Life on Earth uses this source of energy to thrive by transforming the suns energy in to cell growth and reproduction. Trees for example grow and produce leaves that harvest and use the suns energy to photosynthesis and thus produce energy for growing and creating new cells as part of the tree structure growing new branches for further harvesting and increasing their trunk size to accommodate more branches and more energy sources.

Cleantech Transit Inc. was founded to capitalize on technology advances and manufacturing opportunities in the growing clean energy public transportation sector. The Company has expanded its focus to invest directly in specific green projects. Recognizing the many economic and operational advances of converting wood waste into renewable sources of energy, Cleantech has selected to invest in Phoenix Energy (www.phoenixenergy.net). This project could benefit the Company’s manufacturing clients worldwide.

Cleantech Transit Inc. is pleased to provide additional details after achieving success on the 500 KW facility and successfully moving past the interconnection testing stage.

Coming on the recent success at the 500KW facility in Merced, California this poises Phoenix Energy to become a leading developer of renewable biomass distributed generation plants that utilize local resources for local energy.

Currently there are two additional projects being pre-certified by Phoenix Energy in California. The projects are each projected to be 1 MW biomass gasification facilities that will provide both electricity and process heat energy. Each facility will provide enough electricity to power approximately 800 homes as well as process heat to be used in drying agricultural products. The projects are expected to complete by the end of 2012.

Cleantech will be providing details on the expecting closing date of its initial investment into Phoenix Energy in the coming weeks.

For more information about Cleantech Transit, Inc. visit its website www.cleantechtransitinc.com

Power3 Medical Products, Inc (PWRM)

Power3 Medical Products, Inc. is a leading bio-technology company focused on the development of innovative diagnostic tests in the fields of cancer and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (commonly known as ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease).

Power3 applies proprietary methodologies to discover and identify protein biomarkers associated with diseases. Through these processes, Power3 has developed a portfolio of products including BC-SeraPro�, a proteomic blood serum test for the early detection of breast cancer for which it has completed Phase I clinical trials, and NuroPro�, a proteomic blood serum test for the detection of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and ALS diseases, for which it is currently engaged in Phase II clinical trials. These tests are designed to analyze an individual’s proteins to detect the presence of disease, a patient’s disease progression, a patient’s response to a particular drug, and the mechanisms of disease present in the patient for optimal targeted therapy.

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is an age-related deterioration of certain nerve systems, which affects your movement, balance, and muscle control.
Parkinson’s disease is one of the most common movement disorders, affecting 1% of people older than 60 years. PD is about 1.5 times more common in men than in women, and it becomes more common as you age. In PD, brain cells deteriorate (or degenerate) in an area of the brain called the substantia nigra. From the substantia nigra, specific nerve cell tracts connect to another part of the brain called the corpus striatum, where the neurotransmitter (a chemical messenger in the brain) called dopamine is released. Dopamine is an important neurotransmitter and alterations in its concentration can lead to different medical problems.
The loss of these specific brain cells and decline in dopamine concentration are the cornerstone of signs and symptoms of PD as well as the target for treatment. The biological mechanism responsible for the brain cell loss has not been identified.

Power3 Medical Products, Inc is a breakthrough proteomics company specializing in the identification of disease footprints in the areas of chemotherapeutic drug resistance and the early detection of breast cancer and neurological diseases. The research platform is centered on the study of proteomics, the science of protein interactions within living cells. With a combined 50+ years of proteomic experience, the Company has identified 334 protein biomarkers with the following potential medical applications:
1) Breast Cancer 5) Chemotherapeutic Drug Resistance
2) Alzheimer’s Disease 6) Leukemia
3) ALS (Lou Gehrig’s Disease) 7) Gastrointestinal Disease
4) Parkinson’s Disease 8)Metabolic Syndrome
5)
For more information about Power3 Medical Products, Inc. please visit http://www.power3medical.com

Fortress Investment Group LLC (NYSE:FIG) announced that Daniel Mudd, Fortress Chief Executive Officer, is scheduled to present at the KBW 2011 Investment Management & Specialty Finance Conference at the St. Regis Hotel in New York City on Tuesday, June 7, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. (Eastern Time). A live audio webcast of Mr. Mudd’s presentation, including related materials, will be available on the Investor Relations section of Fortress’s website at www.fortress.com. The audio replay of the webcast and presentation will be available online through Tuesday, June 21, 2011.

Fortress Investment Group LLC is a public investment firm specializing in investments in debt and equity securities of public and privately held companies.

Graphic Packaging Holding Company (NYSE:GPK) announced on May 23, 2011 that David A. Perdue has been appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors, which was become effective May 19, 2011. Mr. Perdue was also appointed as a member of the Compensation and Benefits Committee. “We are very pleased to welcome David to the Board of Graphic Packaging,” said John Miller, chairman of the board. “His extensive corporate experience and financial background will serve both the board and the committee well as we work to further the Company’s priorities.”

Graphic Packaging Holding Company, together with its subsidiaries, provides packaging solutions in the United States, Canada, Central/South America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific.

Luby’s Inc. (NYSE:LUB) announced that it will release its fiscal third quarter results on Wednesday, June 8, 2011 after the market closes. In conjunction with the release, Luby’s has scheduled a conference call, which will be broadcast live over the Internet, on Thursday, June 9, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. Central time.
Luby’s, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the ownership and operation of restaurants in the United States.

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Walgreen Makes Big Global Deal as Sales Fall; The Street is Skeptical

Walgreen (WAG) shares are down 5% this morning after the company announced a big investment in UK health and beauty retailer Alliance Boots. Investors may be reacting to the deal, or to the messy quarterly results that Walgreen also announced.

Walgreen posted in-line earnings, but saw comparable store sales fall 6.6% in the third quarter, and prescription sales at comparable stores fell 9.9%. Its dispute with pharmacy benefits manager Express scripts (ESRX) weighed on results, reducing EPS by 6 cents, the company said (although it’s unclear whether that includes the impact that fewer prescriptions had on sales in the other parts of the store, which were also weak).

Walgreen and Express scripts have agreed to drop legal claims against each other, but it’s unclear whether Walgreen will be filling Express scripts prescriptions like it did before their partnership ended on Jan. 1. That could weigh on Walgreen, because Express scripts recently received government approval to buy Medco Health Solutions and become the biggest benefits manager in the country.

Walgreen will pay $6.7 billion for a 45% stake in Alliance Boots, and will have the option to take full control of the company in 2015. The deal will allow Walgreen to tap into emerging markets growth. The deal is worth 8.7 times Alliance Boot’s EBITDA, Bloomberg calculated.

Desperately Seeking Yield Through Equities Part 10: The Importance of Context and Price

We have reviewed a number of investments in the equity sector that produce attractive dividend yields. Many of these are "special" or "unusual" equities in the sense that they are subject to peculiar regulatory restrictions (Business Development Companies - BDCs), are subject to special tax rules (Master Limited Partnerships - MLPs), are subject to price regulation (public utilities), or are required to pay out large percentages of earnings as dividends.

  • Context - Many investors see the world as consisting of stocks, bonds and cash and allocate among the three. Some of the "special' investments we have been discussing may not even show up on their radar screens. Stepping back a moment and viewing the universe of investment opportunities, it may make sense to think of some of these investments as occupying a space in the investment spectrum somewhere between bonds and equities. This is especially true of BDCs and mortgage real estate investment trusts (mortgage REITS) - both of which earn money by holding large quantities of debt instruments and are, thus, somewhat similar to bond funds.
  • Assessing the attractiveness of dividend oriented stocks must , therefore, involve an analysis of the comparative merit of bonds and ordinary stocks.

    In the early 1980s, there were times when 10 year Treasuries were yielding 15%. In that world, the value of a BDC or mortgage REIT which pays a $5-a-share dividend, would be very different from that value in today's interest rate environment. Similarly, in the late 1990s, stock valuations reached untenable levels and created an atmosphere in which many of the dividend oriented investments discussed in this series of articles were cheap compared to ordinary stocks. Because the equities discussed in this series tend to fall between bonds and "ordinary stocks" on the investment spectrum, it is important to compare them to both of these alternatives. With the 10 year Treasury yielding less than 3% and having a "price earnings ratio" (the inverse of yield) of nearly 35, it is clear than many of the investments in this series are superior alternatives to Treasuries. In the early days of the recovery, corporate bond spreads were still large, but now they have narrowed and even "high yield" bonds are priced to produce modest yields. Thus, I would advise yield-oriented investors to prefer utility stocks, agency mortgage REITS, BDCs and some of the other investments described in this series to bonds.

    A more difficult question is raised by the comparison to "ordinary stocks." A number of solid companies with good growth prospects are now paying decent yields. I am thinking of Intel (INTC) (3.2%), Procter & Gamble (PG) (3.3%), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) (3.4%), Kimberly-Clark (KMB) (4.2%), and ConocoPhillips (COP) (3.5%). This yield pales in comparison with yields available from Annaly (NLY) (14.5% ), American Capital Agency (AGNC) (18.9%) and other mortgage REITS and are well below the levels paid by most BDCs and equity REITS.

    However, the strong "ordinary stocks" have been increasing their dividends at rates of between 8 and 10% per year. Many of the best companies increased their dividends right through the 2008-09 panic and recession. In the long term, an investor may actually receive more dividend income from one of these "ordinary stocks" than from some of the stocks described in this series because of these steady dividend increases. In the short term, price appreciation in some of the ordinary stocks may more than make up for a lower yield.

    I guess my bottom line is that bonds are overvalued, most of the specialty equities reviewed in this series are probably fairly valued, and many ordinary stocks are seriously undervalued. I certainly would not advise an investor to create a portfolio made up of entirely of the kinds of stocks reviewed in this series. They have their place in a portfolio and I would advise an investor heavily overweight in bonds to consider some mortgage REITS, BDCs, equity REITs, some utility stocks, strong telcom stocks, and even - ahem - some Philip Morris International (PM) as alternatives to bonds. But I would be less enthusiastic about switching from solid, blue chip stocks like the ones mentioned above to the stocks described in this series.

  • Price - Price is critically important in evaluating the stocks discussed in this series. None of these stocks are "runaway" growth stories which can reward an investor regardless of the entry price. Most of them have limited growth potential - although equity REITs, telcom stocks, MLPs and some BDCs can rack up some solid growth if circumstances are rightly aligned, it is very unlikely that there will be an Apple (AAPL) or Google (GOOG) in any of the groups of stocks discussed in this series. On the other hand, very few of these companies will go out of business or fall into Chapter 11 bankruptcy (although there were a few REITs that went down in the recent financial panic). In a real sense, then, there is no "best" or even "better" group of these investments in a fundamental sense. It all depends on the price. MLPs may or may not be attractive compared to BDCs depending upon the price of each set of securities.
  • In early 2009, American Capital (ACAS) was one of most problematic BDCs in terms of leverage issues, asset write downs and lender terrorism. However, at a price below $2 a share, an investor was essentially buying a pool of debt instruments at a drastic discount. It may turn out in retrospect that Gramercy Capital (GKK) and RAIT Financial (RAS) offer similar opportunities even as we speak. "Bad" companies can be good investments if the price is right. This is especially true for companies discussed in this series because very few of the "good" companies are going to be able to generate enormous growth in earnings or share price and very few of the "bad" companies will actually go out of business.

    The agency mortgage REITS are an interesting special case here because they produce such enormous yields that an investor could withstand some price depreciation and still obtain an overall double digit return on his or her investment. For that reason, I like them here and would tend to load up on some of the names discussed in Part 2. Just remember that it is the U.S. Treasury that stands behind the agency securities that Annaly holds and, if the U.S. Treasury emerges as the next mega-deadbeat, look out below!!

    As to the other groups, I believe an investor should constantly be looking for opportunities to buy on pull backs and should be attentive to finding the right entry point. Each of the groups discussed in the different parts in this series has a mix of growth potential, current dividend yield and downside risk. At this point, I tend to favor equity REITs, non-agency mortgage REITS, BDCs with growth potential, MLPs, AT&T (T), Verizon (VZ), and Phillip Morris International (PM) - in addition to agency mortgage REITs.

    Disclosure: I am long INTC, PG, JNJ, KMB, COP, GKK, RAS, NLY, AGNC, PM, T, VZ, ACAS.